Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Ralph Smith v. Oliver Bell, et al
as 10-40904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH B. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OLIVER J. BELL, RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOHN DOE and others
Ralph Smith v. Oliver Bell, et al
as 10-40856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH B. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OLIVER J. BELL, BRAD LIVINGSTON, RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and others
Ralph Smith v. Oliver Bell, et al
as 10-40514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH B. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OLIVER J. BELL, BRAD LIVINGSTON, RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and others
Ralph Smith v. Neita Hullum, et al
as 10-50339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH B. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
NEITA HULLUM, JULIE THALER, DIRECTORS REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Smith v. Bell et al
as 5:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ralph B Smith
Defendant:
Oliver J. Bell, Brad Livingston, Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens
as 5:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Ralph B Smith
Defendant:
Rissi L Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph Smith v. Mary Sheeley, et al
as 09-50785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH B. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY K. SHEELEY, Senior Warden and PHYSICAL THERAPY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
Smith v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv02025
Petitioner:
Ralph B Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hullum et al
as 6:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ralph B. Smith
Defendant:
Neita Hullum, Julie Thaler, Directors Review Committee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Sheeley et al
as 6:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ralph B. Smith
Defendant:
Mary K. Sheeley and Physical Therapy Alumni Association
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
