Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Dowling v. Sears Roebuck & Co
as 3:2016cv02924
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dowling
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of John and Raquel Douglas v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 4:2016cv02126
Plaintiff:
State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of John and Raquel Douglas
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. , Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Watts Regulator, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nationwide Property & Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deeds v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Judith Deeds and David Deeds
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Khadi Jones
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. , Nathaniel Ray and Does A, B, C and D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mlinar et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 2:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mlinar , Jay Mlinar and Jon Mlinar
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. , Sears Holdings Management Corp. and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haynes et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co
as 6:2014cv00927
Plaintiff:
Alvin Haynes and Stephanie Haynes
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and X Y Z Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Kane v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 5:2014cv00134
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Plaintiff:
Richard Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
