Cases 11 - 20 of 10,830
Fisk v. Lumpkin
as 24-50452
Petitioner:
Walter Fisk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Banks v. Lumpkin
as 24-40406
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40405
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jordan v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Mrs. FNU Johnson, Holliday Unit Intake Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Lumpkin
as 24-10482
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Sosa, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McHenry v. Lumpkin
as 24-10481
Petitioner:
Jimmy Floyd McHenry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Class v. Lumpkin
as 24-10483
Petitioner:
Luis E. Class
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Flowers v. Lumpkin
as 24-10486
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Flowers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Garrett v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jefferson Co. Corr. Facility, Corrhealth L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-20239
Petitioner:
Robert F. Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
