Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Lindsay et al v. Collier et al
as 3:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Head Warden Damon Andrews, Former Head Warden Felipe Gonzalez and Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Lindsay and Michael Joseph Bien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wright et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Defendant:
Sylvia Valdez, E. Guerra, Tanya Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal v. Head Warden of Polunsky Unit et al
as 4:2019cv03409
Defendant:
Major Vincent and Head Warden of Polunsky Unit
Plaintiff:
Courtney Royal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovings v. Head Warden et al
as 4:2019cv02412
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales, Head Warden and Assistant Warden
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. C Moore et al
as 4:2019cv02358
Defendant:
Ms C Moore, M Thompson, G Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Mathew Davis and Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Esparza et al
as 4:2019cv02370
Defendant:
A Gracia, Head Warden P.S., Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Mathew Davis and Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Herrera et al
as 4:2019cv02053
Plaintiff:
David T. Moore
Defendant:
Co. V Officer Raul Mendoza, Co. V Officer Courtney Mitchell, Head Warden Robert Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Davis v. Head Warden, et al
as 19-40252
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN G. MILLER, A.T.S. J. SALLES and HEAD WARDEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY M. DAVIS
Davis v. Miller et al
as 4:2019cv00504
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Defendant:
C.O. III J. Padilla, Counselor A. Canc and Head Warden G. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Head Warden et al
as 2:2019cv00045
Defendant:
J A.T.S. Salles, G Assistant Warden Miller and The Head Warden
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
