Cases 21 - 30 of 183
NATIONAL INDOOR RV CENTERS, LLC v. JAYCO, INC.
as 4:2017cv00475
Defendant:
JAYCO, INC.
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL INDOOR CENTER-GA, LLC , NIRVC-AZ, LLC and NATIONAL INDOOR RV CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houp et al v. Jayco, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00918
Plaintiff:
Carol Houp and Karen Rushing
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Hooper v. Jayco, Inc. of Indiana et al
as 2:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Lance P. Hooper
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc., of Indiana and Steve's Mobile Home & R.V. Repair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Norton et al v. Jayco Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03289
Plaintiff:
Ryan Norton and Lisa Norton
Defendant:
Jayco Inc and Lippert Components Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Ritchie v. Jayco, Inc. of Indiana et al
as 3:2016cv00661
Defendant:
Hope's Camper Corner, Inc., Iberia Bank and Jayco, Inc. of Indiana
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Patin et al v. Jayco Inc of Indiana et al
as 1:2015cv01679
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D Patin and Stacy L Patin
Defendant:
Jayco Inc of Indiana, Dixie Motors L L C, Spartan Chassis Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Cunningham v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01964
Plaintiff:
Corwin Marcos Cunningham
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc. , Jayco Enterprises Inc and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keyes v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01970
Plaintiff:
Talafarron Keyes
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Corwin Marcos Cunningham
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc. , Jayco Enterprises, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Keyes v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
Talafarron Keyes
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
