Cases 21 - 30 of 347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00170
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00015
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AAA Bonding Agency, Inc. et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
AAA Bonding Agency, Inc. and Safety National Casualty Corp.
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Loretta Lynch and Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00145
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00013
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00094
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00012
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nguyen v. Lynch et al
as 4:2017cv00012
Petitioner:
Hien The Nguyen
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Patrict Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
