Cases 21 - 30 of 200
Edwards v. General Motors, LLC
as 5:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Marquis Edwards
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Blankenship v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dominique Marquis Blankenship
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Samuels v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Menion Marquis Samuels
Defendant:
FNU Henry, FNU Pollock, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wallace et al v. Tillman et al
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
DeeAntonio Wallace, Terryona Mitchell and Rodney Shaw
Defendant:
Marquis Tillman, Arch Insurance Co, Advantage Leasing, Inc. and others
Interpleader:
Advantage Leasing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Wilson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Marquis Deleon Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wallace et al v. Tillman et al
as 3:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Terryona Mitchell, Rodney Shaw and Deeantonio Wallace
Interpleader:
Marquis Tillman and R E Garrison Trucking Inc
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Co and Advantage Leasing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02084
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
D. Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kingsby v. Unknown Defendants
as 6:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kingsby
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01150
Petitioner:
Marquis Valentee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
