Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Richard Vaden v. Timothy Outlaw, Warden, et al
as 13-60591
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD VADEN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and TIMOTHY OUTLAW, Warden
Vaden v. Outlaw et al
as 4:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Richard Vaden
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw , Marshall County Correctional Facility and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orlandus Hunt
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Derice Sharon Hunt Lambert, Jeff Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Marshall County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Barry Stephan Townsend
Defendant:
Marshall County Correctional Facility, Bernice Brown, Willie M Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Marshall County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Tony Guy
Defendant:
Marshall County Correctional Facility, Streeter and Emmanuel Kpabitey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy White, Sr. v. Marshall County Corrtl Facil, et al
as 10-60569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY WHITE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JESSIE STREETER, Warden, individually and in his official capacity, MARK E. BOURLAND, Chief of Security, individually and in his official capacity and others
Ray Lenoir v. J. Streeter
as 10-60327
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAY CHARLES LENOIR
Respondent - Appellee:
J J STREETER, Warden of Marshall County Correctional Facility
Hunt v. Tupelo Lee County Juvenile and Adult Criminal Systems et al
as 1:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orlandus Hunt
Defendant:
Tupelo Lee County Juvenile and Adult Criminal Systems, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Tupelo Lee County Adult Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
