Cases 21 - 30 of 183
McNeal v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeal v. Director et al
as 4:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
Director and Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Jamie Mcneal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. The Laundry Doctor, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Brandyn McNeal
Defendant:
The Laundry Doctor, Inc. doing business as Locker MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McNeal v. Turner et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal and Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
A Turner, T Martinez and Wade T Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles Board Administration
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles Board Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Tyrus McNeal
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
McNeal v. Schaap et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal and Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
Judge Dan L Schaap, Tripp Jones, Steve M Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Schaap et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal and Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
Dan L Schaap, Tripp Jones, Steve M Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Hardy et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal
Defendant:
Ombudsman Andrea Hardy and Institutional Parole Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
