Cases 21 - 30 of 493
Gibson v. Regan
as 5:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Orleans Parish Criminal Court et al
as 2:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Criminal Court and Judge Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
as 3:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Bickham
as 3:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ollivierre et al v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Otis Ollivierre and Contrena Ollivierre
Defendant:
Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mays v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, F C I Oakdale, Warden Marteneiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gibson v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Clear Blue Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv02969
Plaintiff:
Otis Cunningham
Defendant:
Clear Blue Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Gibson v. Regan
as 2:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Regan
as 3:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
