Cases 21 - 30 of 241
Neptali Soriano Ponce v. Donyor Madaminov et al
as 1:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Candido Neptali Soriano Ponce
Defendant:
Donyor Madaminov and TJ Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martinez v. Guerra et al
as 7:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Pete Edwin Martinez
Defendant:
Eddie Guerra, Corporal Mora, Adan Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Troy Kirk
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, NFN Hinley, NFN Ponce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponce et al v. Fay Servicing LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
Jose Ponce and Susana Torres
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, Fay Servicing LLC and others
Ponce v. Bexar County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Alfonso A. Ponce, IV
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff's Office, Bexar County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff Javier Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 7:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Marco Ponce and Liz Karely Ponce
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Garcia v. Ponce et al
as 4:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Guadalupe F Ponce, Pablo Picado, Brandon McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medliant Inc. v. Ponce de Leon
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Medliant Inc.
Defendant:
Katrina Ponce de Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kirk v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Troy Kirk
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU Deleon, K. Balawejder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
