Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Chintz v. Chisholm et al
as 4:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Scott Chintz
Defendant:
John W. Chisholm, H. Richard Walton, Robert M. Schmitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schonder et al v. Flotek Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03432
Plaintiff:
Michael Schonder and Kim Werba
Defendant:
Flotek Industries, Inc., John W. Chisholm, H. Richard Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dong v. Flotek Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03417
Plaintiff:
Qingfeng Dong
Defendant:
Flotek Industries, Inc., John W. Chisholm, H. Richard Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walpole v. Flotek Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03383
Defendant:
Flotek Industries, Inc., John W. Chisholm, Robert M. Schmitz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walpole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ho v. Flotek Industries, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03327
Plaintiff:
Caleb Ho
Defendant:
Flotek Industries, Inc., John W. Chisholm, H. Richard Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Coker v. Select Energy Services, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coker
Defendant:
Select Energy Services, LLC and John Schmitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Global Traders, Inc. et al v. SPFM, L.P. et al
as 7:2015cv00012
Defendant:
SPFM, L.P. , Werner Schmitz and Ritter Concept America, Corp.
Third_party_defendant:
Global Traders, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Safar and Mateo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Schmitz et al v. Takeda California Inc et al
as 6:2014cv03425
Plaintiff:
Robert L Schmitz and Linda Schmitz
Defendant:
Takeda California Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muse v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2012cv01762
Plaintiff:
William Alan Muse
Defendant:
Doug Schmitz, David Knight and B Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Noel Schmitz
as 11-11194
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOEL RICHARD SCHMITZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
