Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Domingo Angulo v. Shawn Brown, et al
as 19-40887
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFERY MCCRYSTAL, Agent, United States Customs and Border Protection and SHAWN BROWN, Agent, United States Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINGO ANGULO
Pena Arita v. United States of America et al
as 7:2019cv00288
Plaintiff:
Orlanda del Carmen Pena Arita
Defendant:
Rene "Orta" Fuentes, Crecencio Galvan, Unknown United States Customs and Border Protection Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Morgan et al
as 2:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Garcia
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, Tim Morgan and Thomas B Morgan
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-40688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dominique Roque v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al
as 7:2017cv00470
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection and Lindsey Renee Robbins
Plaintiff:
Dominique Roque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-41256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-41001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00281
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-40077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Texas v. USA, et al
as 16-41411
Movant - Appellant:
RHONDA ANN FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
