Cases 31 - 40 of 391
Mendez et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01768
Plaintiff:
Ana Miranda Mendez, Cuauhtemoc Miranda Mendez, Felicitas Mendez and others
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company LLC, Sophie Helene Twyman, Walmart Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Salas v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Michael Lara Salas
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Rodriguez-Salas
as 23-50301
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Senovio Rodriguez-Salas
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Santibanez v. Collier et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jose Santibanez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Warden Christopher Norsworthy, Silva Ceniceros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Collum et al
as 6:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
John Salas
Defendant:
Asst Warden Michael A Collum, Lieutenant Shon E McGee, Captain Unknown Purkuski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Salas
as 23-40121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Andres Salas, Jr.
Meyers v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Michael Meyers, Boogey Man, Gabriel Salas and others
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Unifirst Corporation v. Salas
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Unifirst Corporation
Defendant:
Jessica Salas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Salas v. Lumpkin
as 2:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Jimmy Salas
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
