Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Nguyen et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv05090
Plaintiff:
Ninh T. Nguyen and Binh T. Nguyen
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. and ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Champion et al v ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00417
Plaintiff:
Bryan Champion, Ronnie Danage, John Engelke and others
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sun Packing, Inc. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv03018
Plaintiff:
Sun Packing, Inc.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Grazier et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01167
Plaintiff:
Donald Grazier, Karen Grazier and Gold Eagle Coins & Jewelry
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc, ADT Security Services Inc, ADT Security Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Grazier et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 4:2008cv00429
Plaintiff:
Donald Grazier, Karen Grazier and Gold Eagle Coins & Jewelry
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc, ADT Security Services Inc, ADT Security Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Monitronics International, Inc. v. Paradox Security Systems, Ltd.
as 3:2008mc00033
Plaintiff:
Monitronics International, Inc. and Monitronics International, Inc.
Defendant:
Paradox Security Systems, Ltd., ADT Security Services Inc, Digital Security Controls, Ltd. and others
Sekil v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00510
Plaintiff:
Yusuph Sekil and Hiphop Fashions
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gellman v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00282
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc, Diebold, Incorporated, Digital Security Controls, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
