Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Armenta v. TDCJ et al
as 5:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carlos Aviles Armenta
Defendant:
TDCJ, Dawn Grounds, Jeffrey Catoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armenta v. United States Of America
as 3:2010cv00287
Petitioner:
Alan Morales Armenta
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Gabriel Armenta
as 10-50078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GABRIEL DELL ARMENTA
Armenta v. Purdie and Associates, Inc.
as 4:2009cv04053
Plaintiff:
Amy Armenta
Defendant:
Purdie and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Futurewei Technologies, Inc. v. E Oliver Capital et al
as 4:2009cv00455
Plaintiff:
Futurewei Technologies, Inc. and Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
MIO Group Ltd., MIO Group Incorporated, Gilbert R. Armenta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
USA v. Alan Armenta
as 09-50536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALAN MORALES ARMENTA, also known as Yonathan David Montana Morales, also known as Jose Israel Robledo, also known as Yonhatan Montana Morales
Carlos Armenta v. Jacqueline Chatman, et al
as 09-40368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS AVILES ARMENTA
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE CHATMAN, Mailroom Supervisor, Telford Unit, STEPHANIE G. DERAMCY, Mailroom clerk at Telford Unit, JOSETTA LINDSEY, Mailroom employee, Telford Unit and others
Carlos Armenta v. John Pryor, et al
as 09-40298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS AVILES ARMENTA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PRYOR, Correctional Officer, JEFFREY LANN, Lieutenant and JOHNSON, Correctional Officer
USA v. Aguirre-Lopez
as 09-50036
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NOEL AGUIRRE-LOPEZ, also known as Roberto Gomez-Hernandez, also known as Juan Armenta-Gonzalez, also known as Noe Aguirre Lopez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
