Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Holm v. Sausenhagen et al
as 5:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Officer FNU Martinez, Sergeant FNU Sausenhagen and Officer FNU Ruiz
Plaintiff:
Zachariah J. Holm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Flores v. Williams, et al
as 19-50138
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER FNU MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, Connally Unit, WARDEN FNU GIVENS, Connally Unit, WARDEN FNU STENGEL, Connally Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC FLORES
Flores v. Williams et al
as 5:2018cv01347
Defendant:
Warden FNU Givens, Warden FNU Williams, Officer FNU Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiede v. Martinez et al
as 5:2018cv01277
Plaintiff:
Kurt Steven Tiede
Defendant:
Deputy FNU Ramirez, LT. FNU Martinez, Javier Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lin et al
as 1:2018cv00384
Defendant:
Bastrop County Jail, CMA FNU Bdrriga, Dr. Wei-Ann Lin and others
Plaintiff:
Hilyerd Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Matt et al
as 1:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
David Lee Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Matt, FNU Flores, FNU Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Douglas v. Ector County et al
as 7:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Douglas
Defendant:
Ector County, C. O. Gonzales and Sgt. FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro-Valerio v. Warden Martinez
as 4:2017cv00044
Petitioner:
Favio Daniel Castro-Valerio
Respondent:
Warden FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Longoria v. Thompson et al
as 4:2017cv00011
Defendant:
David Flores, Co. III FNU Martinez, FNU Mongomery and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Soto Longoria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2017cv00028
Petitioner:
Charles Carr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
