Cases 31 - 40 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-20118
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 - Hearing on Denial of Application for Naturalizatio
Sanchez-Medina v. Sessions et al
as 7:2018cv00009
Defendant:
Jefferson B Sessions, III, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Sanchez-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hartnett et al v. Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2018cv00008
Defendant:
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Hartnett and Tiffany Hartnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Vy v. Hartnett
as 2:2017cv07073
Plaintiff:
Dao Van Vy
Defendant:
John J Hartnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NEMA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 4:2017cv01525
Plaintiff:
YASSER J. NEMA
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Citizenship and Immigration Services , John F Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Vishnu Meda v. John Hartnett
as 17-60286
Petitioner - Appellant:
VISHNU PRADEEP MEDA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN HARTNETT, Warden, LaSalle Detention Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
