Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Hess v. FCI Fort Worth, et al
as 08-10779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY DEAN HESS
Defendant - Appellee:
FCI FORT WORTH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, M GUTIERREZ, Unit Manager and others
Hess v. Fed Corrtl Ft Worth, et al
as 08-10470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY DEAN HESS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FORT WORTH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, M GUTIERREZ, Unit Manager and others
McBarron v. Fed Bureau Prisons, et al
as 08-10197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MCBARRON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NEWTON KENDIG, Director, Bureau of Prisons, LES E FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth and others
Chambers v. Jeter, et al
as 08-10004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
COLE JETER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution - Fort Worth, LES PHILLIPS, Captain, Federal Correctional Institution - Fort Worth, MUNOZ, Lieutenant, Special Agent Internal Affairs at Federal Correctional Institution - Fort Worth and others
Hale v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 07-60997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HALE
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, BINGHAM, Superintendent of Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Edmond v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Directors et al
as 4:2007cv01008
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Edmond
Defendant:
Warrens Recho Morgan, Butcher, Luke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmond v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Directors et al
as 6:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Edmond
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Directors, Warrens Recho Morgan, FNU Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
