Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Sampson v. Reed et al
as 6:2015cv00451
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Sampson
Defendant:
Tanya Reed, Carl Durrough, FNU Brabham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Mark Stiles Unit et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fernandez
Defendant:
Mark Stiles Unit, John Sealy Galveston Hospital, Beauford H IV Jester 4 Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Medical Director John Doe et al
as 1:2015cv00110
Defendant:
Medical Director John Doe, Administrative Director, Jester 4 Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Price et al
as 4:2015cv00477
Plaintiff:
Chavez Price
Defendant:
Daniel Price, Jester Simms, III and Onya Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jester Unit
as 4:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Otis Davis
Defendant:
Jester Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESTER v. W. J. THOMAS TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
LAUREN JESTER
Defendant:
W. J. THOMAS TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Morrison, et al v. Brian Fettig, et al
as 14-41388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MORRISON and CM CAPITAL, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN FETTIG, VIC CRANFILL, LISA CRANFILL and others
James Perkins v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 13-20729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DENNIS PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Senior Warden Jester and JACQUELINE JONES, Assistant Warden Jester
James Perkins v. City of Garland Police Dept., et al
as 13-11183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DENNIS PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GARLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, Internal Affairs Staff/Officers, CITY OF GARLAND POLICE CHIEF, RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and others
Cox v. Collin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2013cv00648
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Collin County Sheriff's Office, Terry Box, Rick Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
