Cases 31 - 40 of 300
Safe Pack, LLC v. GeoVera Speciality Insurance Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04510
Plaintiff:
Safe Pack, LLC
Defendant:
GeoVera Speciality Insurance Services, Inc.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant:
Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant:
Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Manchester v. Anco Insulations, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Cecil C Manchester
Defendant:
Arrow Electronics, Union Carbide Corporation, Montello, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LeBeau et al v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv03557
Plaintiff:
Gayle LeBeau, Paula Lebeau, Crytstal Lebeau Islam and others
Cross Claimant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Defendant:
Eagle Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., McCarty Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company and Stonewall Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Boutte et al v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv03321
Plaintiff:
Shelton A Boutte, Arlene Boutte and Shelton A. Boutte, Sr.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Defendant:
M.A. Patout & Son Limited, LLC, McDermott, Inc., Riley Power, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Eagle, Inc., The Manville Personal Injury Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Goffner v. Avondale Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03047
Plaintiff:
Wilson Goffner, Sr.
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Anco Insulaitons, Inc., Arrowood Indemnity Company and others
Cross Defendant:
International Paper Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, McCarty Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Matherne et al v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv02656
Plaintiff:
Ted Matherne Sr., Ted Matherne Jr., Giselle Matherne Ordoyne and others
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, The Travelers Indemnity Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rivet v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv02584
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rivet and Tommy P. Rivet
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, The Travelers Indemnity Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Uniroyal, Inc., Eagle Asbestos & Packing Co., Inc., Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Manville Personal Injury Trust and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
John Soules Foods, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
John Soules Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
John Soules Foods, Inc. v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Protein, Cargill, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Soules Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
