Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Brueckel v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brueckel
Defendant:
State of Texas, All Arresting Officers, Magistrate Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County District Clerk, Judge William Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 4:2021cv02069
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County District Clerk, Judge William Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coalwell v. McLennan County Adult Probation et al
as 6:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Scott Eldred Coalwell
Defendant:
Tana Harrison and McLennan County Adult Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2021cv00526
Defendant:
Prosecutor Emily Dixon, Probation Officer Hollice Phillips, Judge George Gallagher and others
Plaintiff:
Ketorian Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00079
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mitchell et al v. Humphrey
as 4:2020cv03660
Defendant:
Probation Officer Aonzo Humphrey
Plaintiff:
Sandra Mitchell and Celexia Smith
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Strouse v. Mabry et al
as 3:2020cv03231
Defendant:
Jason Mabry, United States Probation Dallas Division and William Barr
Plaintiff:
James Strouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strouse v. United States Probation Fort Worth Division
as 4:2020cv00707
Respondent:
United States Probation Fort Worth Division
Petitioner:
James Strouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery, AL et al
as 6:2020cv00414
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, AL, Sheriff D. T. Marshall and Probate Judge Reese McKinney
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
