Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Arthur Lowe v. Brittney Hamilton, et al
as 18-50630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR LOWE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRITTNEY S. HAMILTON, R. POOL, VICKI BARROW, Program Manager - Access to Courts and others
Alpine v. Richerson
as 7:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Al Pine and Charles Alpine
Respondent:
Kendall Richardson and Warden Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minnfee v. Holmes et al
as 5:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Paul NLN, Joseph Bernard Marsh, Elbert Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of Texas et al
as 7:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Wilson
Defendant:
State of Texas, James V Allred Unit, James D Anders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alpine v. Richerson et al
as 7:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Charles Alpine
Defendant:
Kendall Richerson, Jonny Eastep, Javaris G Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2018cv00164
Defendant:
Assistant Warden C. Akwitts, Vickie Barrow, Lieutenant Brittney Crippin and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Richerson et al
as 7:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Wayne Edward Cole
Defendant:
Kendall T Richerson, Colby J Sandell, Michael J Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Atteberry et al
as 7:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
Barbara L Atteberry, Joshua R. Capps, Kendall T Richerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Minnfee v. David Gutierrez, et al
as 18-50320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAIRMAN DAVID GUTIERREZ, FBI, Associate Counsel, CLASSIFICATION T.T. and others
Richerson v. Marshall County Correctional Facility
as 3:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Robert Richerson
Defendant:
Marshall County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
