Cases 31 - 40 of 208
Kerry v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 6:2016cv01658
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co
Plaintiff:
Ira Kerry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz v. Sears, Roebuck And Co.
as 7:2016cv00603
Plaintiff:
Micaela Cruz
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck And Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dowling v. Sears Roebuck & Co
as 3:2016cv02924
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dowling
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeny et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2016cv01052
Plaintiff:
Bryan E. Freeny , Charles C. Freeny, III and James P. Freeny
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Holdings Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Spence et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00943
Plaintiff:
Dan M. Spence and Rachel Spence
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. , KCD IP, LLC and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cefalu et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 2:2016cv13253
Plaintiff:
Vincent Cefalu and Patricia Cefalu
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Sears Holdings Corporation and KCD IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of John and Raquel Douglas v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 4:2016cv02126
Plaintiff:
State Farm Lloyds as Subrogee of John and Raquel Douglas
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. , Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Watts Regulator, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nationwide Property & Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
