Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Salomon v. Davis
as 4:2017cv02175
Petitioner:
Juan Torres Salomon
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Coreas
as 4:2017cv01972
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Fausto Salomon Coreas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
as 2:2017cv00136
Petitioner:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
St. Sauveur, et al v. Smart, et al
as 2:2016cv16983
Plaintiff:
Salomon St. Sauveur and Lawanda St. Sauveur
Defendant:
Roderick Smart, Smart Moves Trucking and Ricky Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jorge-Mendoza v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00671
Plaintiff:
Eric Salomon Jorge-Mendoza
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Herrera v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Salomon Herrera
Defendant:
Respco LLC and Wells Fargo, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. BRIT11765 v. Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company and Salomon Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. BRIT11765
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
USA v. Salomon Busto
as 15-51214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SALOMON BUSTOS
USA v. Eric Jorge-Mendoza
as 15-41675
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC SALOMON JORGE-MENDOZA
Armstrong et al v. Curves International, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
A2D Enterprises, LLC, AB Draper, LLC, Anne Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Curves International Holdings, Inc, Curves International Inc. and Howard Gary Heavin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
