Cases 31 - 40 of 2,313
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
State of Texas v. DHS
as 24-40160
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Valerie Laveus, Francis Arauz, Paul Zito and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00979
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Mayorkas
as 24-60192
Petitioner:
Rita Kpotie Smith
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dillard v. Wray
as 24-50304
Plaintiff:
Carviel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Attorney General FNU Garland, Attorney General FNU Rosenblum and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
