Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Taylor v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2016cv00102
Defendant:
Susan Pamerleau and The State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Wayne Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Modesett v. Pamerleau
as 5:2016cv00087
Petitioner:
Shad C. Modesett
Respondent:
Susan Pamerleau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perkins v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2016cv00075
Defendant:
Brandon Jackson, Nicholas A. Lahood, FNU McBain and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv01170
Defendant:
Susan Pamerleau and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Joel Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2015cv01114
Plaintiff:
Phillip Harvey
Defendant:
Susan Pamerleau and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. Plata et al
as 5:2015cv01031
Defendant:
Raul Banasco, Michael Flores, FNU Padilla and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miguel Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony-El v. Wolff et al
as 5:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
Madinah Anthony-El
Defendant:
Bexar County Offices, City of San Antonio, Royla Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dukes v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv00937
Defendant:
Alamo Heights Police Dept., Bexar County Sheriff's Department, L. De La Rosa and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2015cv00904
Defendant:
Mark Hernandez and Susan Pamerleau
Plaintiff:
Kurt Tiede
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joiner v. University Detention Health Care Services et al
as 5:2015cv00835
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Joiner
Defendant:
Susan Pamerleau, University Detention Health Care Services and Katherine Whiteley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
