Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Adolfo Vigil-Reyes, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60760
Petitioner:
ADOLFO ANTONIO VIGIL-REYES, ELSIS ABIGAIL VIGIL-REYES and LESLY GISELLE REYES-VIGIL
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vigil v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv02325
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Vigil
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Vigil v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00242
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Vigil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roppolo v. Vigilant Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv06809
Defendant:
Vigilant Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Roppolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Perez-De Vigil v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60325
Petitioner:
MARIA ESTERLINA PEREZ-DE VIGIL
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Franklin v. Vigilant Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Beverley Franklin
Defendant:
Vigilant Insurance Company , Mathison Insurance Partners, Inc. and Hopkins Insurance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ogletree v. Vigil et al
as 2:2017cv03724
Defendant:
Michelle L Dyer, David Buttross, III, Jacob Vigil and others
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah S Ogletree
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Goza v. ProActive Partners Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Deborah Goza
Defendant:
ProActive Partners Inc, Maxine Vigil Russell and Lawrence Edward Russell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. Federico Carrillo-Vigil
as 17-40076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FEDERICO CARRILLO-VIGIL, also known as Keico, also known as Federico Carrillo Vigil
Armstrong-Head v. ProActive Partners Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Armstrong-Head
Defendant:
ProActive Partners Inc. , Maxine Vigil Russell and Lawrence Edward Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
