Cases 41 - 50 of 17,013
Haran v. Hughes Unit Wardens et al
as 6:2024cv00439
Defendant:
Mailroom Employees, Hughes Unit Wardens, Securus Tech Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Haran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harmon v. People of the State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Devin M Harmon
Defendant:
John Bradford, Oscar D Jaloma, People of the State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winegarner v. City of Irving Texas et al
as 3:2024cv02171
Defendant:
Travis Reyes, City of Irving Texas, John Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
David Winegarner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02189
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02161
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02162
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Colwell et al v. Conner et al
as 4:2024cv03168
Defendant:
Janice Charles, John F. Coggin, Conner and Associates LLC, d/b/a Franchise Marketing Systems and others
Plaintiff:
Shanna M. Colwell and Mark S Colwell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.248.137.108
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv03144
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
