Cases 41 - 50 of 391
Salas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00142
Petitioner:
Jimmy Salas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rockingham Casualty Company v. Ruben Valtierra et al
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rockingham Casualty Company
Defendant:
Ruben Valtierra doing business as Gonzalez Construction, Proclaim Roofing LLC, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
USA v. Holguin
as 22-51090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Holguin, also known as Jorge Salas-Hernandez
Salas v. Wayborn
as 4:2022cv01061
Petitioner:
Gabriel Pornstar Salas
Respondent:
Bill Wayborn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv01010
Petitioner:
Gabriel Pornstar Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salas v. Waybourn
as 4:2022cv00885
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez-Salas v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jose Eduardo Gomez-Salas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Buchanan v. City of Tyler Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Hughey M Buchanan
Defendant:
City of Tyler Police Department, Ethan Sala and FW Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. City of Tyler Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
Hughey M Buchanan
Defendant:
Ethan Sala, FW Holland and City of Tyler Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Salas
as 7:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
William Henderson, III
Defendant:
Nathan Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
