Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ross et al v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Erika Mercado, Drew Hunnicutt, Ryan Zachary Ross and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial, LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, Cash App Investing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Crown Motor Co. et al v. Ally Financial, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc and Ally Bank
Plaintiff:
Crown Motor Co and Royal Imports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackie Gaff v. MSNI Advantage, L.P., et al
as 20-10868
Defendant / Appellee:
Ally Financial, Incorporated, Nealmikelance Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jackie Gaff, also known as Jackie Goff
Jerger v. D&M Leasing Dallas et al
as 3:2020cv02109
Respondent:
Ally Financial Inc and D&M Leasing Dallas
Petitioner:
Charles Jerger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Crown Motor Co. et al v. Ally Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00806
Defendant:
Ally Bank and Ally Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Royal Imports, Inc. and Crown Motor Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaff v. MSNI Advantage, LP et al
as 4:2020cv00644
Plaintiff:
Jackie Gaff and Jackie Goff
Defendant:
Karissa Happe Jones, Krissie, Main Street Asset Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Landry Dixon v. Ally Financial Corporation, et al
as 20-30299
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER LACLAIR, JEFFERY J. BROWN, FRANK W. HOBBS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANDRY DIXON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
