Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Ghedi v. McAleenan et al
as 3:2019cv01919
Plaintiff:
Abdulaziz Ghedi
Defendant:
Kevin K McAleenan, Charles H Kable, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00138
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00042
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Incorrectly Filed
as 7:2019cv00304
Plaintiff:
SUYING MARIA CALDERON-WONG and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kevin K McAleenan, Rodolfo Karisch, Michael J. Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed
as 7:2019cv00305
Plaintiff:
SUYING MARIA CALDERON-WONG and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kevin K McAleenan, Rodolfo Karisch, Michael J. Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed
as 7:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
SUYING MARIA CALDERON-WONG and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Michael J Pitts, Kevin K. McAleenan, Rodolfo Karisch and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00126
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castelli v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv02798
Defendant:
RON ROSENBERG, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY and others
Plaintiff:
PIETRO CASTELLI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
