Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Adams et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jackie D. Adams, Shirley Anderson, Bill Batts and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SPOTTS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Andre Spotts, BILLY AGUERO, MARCUS T. ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jeffery et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv00133
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Jeffery, Donnell Deveon Jenkins, Cheyenne S. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hamilton et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00129
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Margaret Pennie, Frank Quiniero, William J. Manas, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hanks, Patrick ONeal Jackson, Chester Jackson and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc. and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockett v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv00436
Petitioner:
Jerry W Lockett
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv01373
Petitioner:
Jerry W Lockett
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruitt v. Mack-Lockett et al
as 4:2007cv02572
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Pruitt
Defendant:
Naom Mack-Lockett, A. Buen-Camino, Bobby D. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
