Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 315
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Bridges et al v. Eagle Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04392
Plaintiff: Lloyd Bridges Sr., Lloyd Bridges Jr., Leonard Bridges III and others
Cross Defendant: Eagle Inc., Viacom CBS, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant: Taylor Seidenbach, Inc., 3M Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrup Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc., Northrup Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant: Foster Wheeler LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hoover v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2022cv01216
Plaintiff: Jason Hoover
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC, Inc., AGC Chemical Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Monning et al
as 3:2022cv02145
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2003-FF4, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2003-FF4 and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota N A
Defendant: W. Bruce Monning, Anne M. Monning, W Bruce Monning and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trufant v. CHS, Inc. of Minnesota, et al.
as 2:2022cv03256
Plaintiff: Ms. ceneda trufant and Ceneda Trufant
Defendant: CHS Inc of Minnesota and Mobile Mini, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Haddad v. Comcast of Arkansas Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee
as 3:2022cv02625
Plaintiff: Freddie Haddad
Defendant: Comcast of Arkansas Florida Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee, Comcast of Arkansas Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee L L C doing business as Comcast Corp, Comcast Cable Communications Management L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
State of Texas v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff: State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae: New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. State of Texas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Ricks v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
as 4:2022cv02902
Plaintiff: Linda Ricks
Defendant: Best Buy Co., Inc. d/b/a Minnesota Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc. doing business as Minnesota Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Stores LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?