Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Neal v. Clarksdale HMA, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alberta Neal
Defendant:
Clarksdale HMA, LLC , MS Shelby, LLC and John and Jane Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. General Motors LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00855
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Neal and Estate of Gregory L. Neal
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lee v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Dennis O'Neal Lee
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jaqueline Banks, Marshall Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA
as 3:2015cv00667
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Curtis Neal Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dowdy v. U. S. District Court (Northern District ,Mississippi) et al
as 3:2015cv00655
Plaintiff:
William C. Dowdy, Jr.
Defendant:
U. S. District Court (Northern District ,Mississippi) and Neal B. Biggers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Beckham Brothers et al v. Syngenta et al
as 3:2015cv00614
Plaintiff:
Beckham Brothers , Southfork, Inc. , Braswell Enterprise and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. MDOC Office of Medical Compliance et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dennis O'Neal Lee
Defendant:
MDOC Office of Medical Compliance, Christopher Epps, Unknown Zin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. , Kenneth Charles Knight and Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00019
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
