Cases 41 - 50 of 51
USA v. Jose Rea-Beltran
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-50640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS REA-BELTRAN
Rea-Herrera v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2010cv02639
Petitioner:
Miguel Rea-Herrera
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lara-Rea v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Lara-Rea
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rea v. Quality Christmas Trees, LTD et al
as 4:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
Alma Rea
Defendant:
Quality Christmas Trees, LTD , Hooper Landscaping II, LLC and Matthew Hooper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rea-Herrera v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv02514
Petitioner:
Miquel Rea-Herrera
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez et al v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00897
Plaintiff:
Kyong Rea Rodriguez, Leticia Rodriguez, Linda Rodriguez-Pasley and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Mississippi Hub, Inc. v. 36.22 Acres in Simpson County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Hub, Inc.
Defendant:
36.22 Acres in Simpson County, Mississippi, James C. Jones, Thelma Hilliard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rea v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04050
Plaintiff:
Michael William Rea
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Rea-Herrera
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-20423
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIQUEL REA-HERRERA, also known as Miguel Angel Rea, also known as Jose Alfredo Pena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.