Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ericson et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
as 4:2013cv01288
Plaintiff:
David D Ericson and Rosemary Ericson
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, LP , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Wallace v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
as 2:2011cv00235
Plaintiff:
David L. Wallace
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, LP and Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Counter_claimant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Counter_defendant:
David L. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hood v. Valentine & Kebartas, Inc. et al
as 4:2011mc00467
Defendant:
Valentine & Kebartas, Inc., LVNV Funding LLC and Resurgent Capital Services, LP
Plaintiff:
David Hood
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-40418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Locke et al v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
as 4:2011cv00153
Plaintiff:
Herby Locke and Dorothy Locke
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, LP and LVNV Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
