Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Tibbs v. Harden
as 3:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Defendant:
Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tibbs v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-40667
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ISHMAEL TIBBS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Tibbs v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00389
Petitioner:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tibbs vs. Cameron
as 4:2009cv01410
Plaintiff:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Defendant:
Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tibbs v. William McWhorter, et al
as 09-40218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ISHMAEL TIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM B MCWHORTER, WOLLACE, JONES and others
Charles Allen v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, et al
as 09-20094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY ALLEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, A C JANICEK, Warden, CODY GINSEL, Assistant Warden and others
Tibbs v. McWhorter et al
as 3:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Defendant:
William B McWhorter, Wollace, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tibbs v. Gist, et al
as 08-41289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ISHMAEL TIBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY GIST, Judge, In His Official and Individual Capacity, CHIP RADFORD, District Attorney, In His Official and Individual Capacity, MARSHA NORMAND, Attorney at Law, In Her Official and Individual Capacity and others
Tibbs v. Larry et al
as 1:2008cv00546
Plaintiff:
James Ishmael Tibbs
Defendant:
Gist Larry, Chip Radford, Marsha Normand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
