Cases 41 - 50 of 309
AAPS v. ABIM
as 23-40423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Educational Foundation, AAPS
Defendant / Appellee:
American Board of Internal Medicine, ABIM, American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology, ABOG, American Board of Family Medicine, ABFM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-20327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
STATE OF TEXAS v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Martinez, REGIO TRANSPORATION S.A. DE C.V. and Jorge Alberto Martinez doing business as Regio Transportation S.A. De C.V.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Forfeiture in Rem
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
