Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Don Harper v. John Fox, et al
as 09-41234
Petitioner - Appellant:
DON A. HARPER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Thomas DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:09cv148. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 2:06cr259
as 2:2009cv00148
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Souza v. Federal Medical Center Carswell et al
as 3:2009cv00735
Plaintiff:
Heather Ann Souza
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Carswell, W Elaine Chapman, Eddy Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Souza v. Federal Medical Center Carswell et al
as 4:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Heather Ann Souza
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Carswell, W Elaine Chapman, Eddy Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Troy Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 09-30189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT, Brooklyn, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Thomas v. City of Bay City Texas et al
as 3:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Makeba D Thomas
Defendant:
City of Bay City Texas, Bay City Police Dept, Charles Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jennings v. Fed Bureau Prisons, et al
as 09-30058
Petitioner - Appellant:
TROY JENNINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PROBATION, Brooklyn, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Saldana v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2008cv00223
Petitioner:
Francisco Saldana
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, UP Fox, United States Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
