Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 332
Mock v. Garland
as 23-10319
Plaintiff / Appellant: William T. Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Texas, Brady Brown, Gun Owners of America, Incorporated and others
State of Texas v. Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff: State of Texas
Defendant: Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Amicus Curiae: Ten Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
State of Texas et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff: STATE OF TEXAS, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation and others
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Steven M Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mock et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2023xc00232
Plaintiff: William T Mock, Christopher Lewis and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watterson v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00080
Plaintiff: Blake J Watterson
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mock et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff: William T Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition Inc and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Polymer80, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff: Polymer80, Inc.
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Butler-Neebee v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff: Lori Ann Butler-Neebee
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?