Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Powell v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2014cv00840
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powell
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Lee Vance, Lakashia Younger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzales v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carlos Andres Gonzales
Defendant:
Eric Holder , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. , Vance Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vance et al v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Vance , Andrew Vance and Nicole Vance
Defendant:
Yazoo County, Mississippi, Jake Sheriff, Tommy Irvine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Laughlin
as 5:2013cv00124
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin
Plaintiff:
Donovan Anthony Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willis v. Evans et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Derrick Willis
Defendant:
Charles Doug Evans, Clyde Hill, Clarence E. Morgan, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bhatia v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2013cv00027
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mota v. Laughlin et al
as 5:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Elvis Mota
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
