Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Boyd v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Henry Boyd
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter and Thomas Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2013cv06403
Plaintiff:
Glynn E. Smith
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter, Thomas Cope and Deputy Bailys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2013cv06289
Plaintiff:
Robert Maurice Hogan
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter and Thomas Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitch v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2013cv06261
Plaintiff:
Dane Patrick Fitch
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter and Thomas Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hulen et al v. Crane Co. et al
as 4:2013cv02631
Plaintiff:
Mary Hulen and Mary Amida Spear Hulen
Defendant:
Crane Co , Union Carbide Corporation , Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKay v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2013cv05689
Plaintiff:
Corey Darnell McKay
Defendant:
Jerry J Larpenter , Thomas M Cope and R Petie Neel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley v. Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 2:2013cv05256
Plaintiff:
Mario McKinley
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Criminal Justice Complex, Thomas Cope, Ms. Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kates v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2013cv04832
Plaintiff:
Douglas H Kates, Jr
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter , Warden Cope , Justin Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kates v. Larpenter et al
as 3:2013cv01763
Plaintiff:
Douglas H Kates, Jr
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter, Cope, Justin Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Terrebone Parish Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 2:2013cv04325
Plaintiff:
Elroy Coleman
Defendant:
Terrebone Parish Criminal Justice Complex, Unidentified Parties, Dr. Haydel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
