Cases 51 - 60 of 404
Bell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03678
Plaintiff:
Lauri Bell and Terrill Bell
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jones and Robert Jones
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon LLC, American Medical Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv00771
Plaintiff:
Tina Harris
Defendant:
Ethicon Womens Health & Urology, Ethicon L L C, John Doe Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00129
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare Worldwide, John Doe Corporations 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Darla Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meindertsma et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00708
Plaintiff:
Bruce Meindertsma and Jeanne Meindertsma
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, American Medical Systems Inc, Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01714
Plaintiff:
Darren Hubbard and Deborah Hubbard
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01715
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Marilyn D. Clark and James Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hightower-Duffy v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02143
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Karen Hightower-Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00688
Plaintiff:
Margaret Reeves
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tasha Mobley and Douglass Daniels
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
