Cases 51 - 60 of 751
Horton v. Democratic Victory Fund PAC Inc
as 3:2022cv02913
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
Democratic Victory Fund PAC Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Resort Vacations Inc
as 3:2022cv02914
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
Resort Vacations Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. PivotHealth Holdings LLC
as 3:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
PivotHealth Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. End Citizens United
as 3:2022cv02916
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
End Citizens United
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dixon et al v. D.R. Horton, Inc. - Gulf Coast et al
as 3:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Alicia R Dixon and West J Dixon
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc. - Gulf Coast, Bell Mechanical Services, LLC and Bell Mechanical Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Horton v. Texas Federation for Children PAC Inc
as 3:2022cv02736
Plaintiff:
Lucas B Horton
Defendant:
Texas Federation for Children PAC Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Mattinez
as 2:2022cv06126
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Filipe Mattinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Horton
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shekkala Horton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Horton v. Advantage One Brokers Corp
as 3:2022cv02474
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Advantage One Brokers Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Horton v. Rank Media USA LLC
as 3:2022cv02476
Plaintiff:
Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Rank Media USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
