Cases 51 - 60 of 235
Moore v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv02777
Defendant:
A. Smith, K. Striblin, D. Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Moore
Petitioner:
Mark A Munoz, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Bower et al
as 9:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Keith Andre Wilson
Defendant:
Logan Bower, Michael Brown, ., Christopher A Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrell v. Medical Depot, Inc., et al
as 4:2020cv00507
Plaintiff:
Patric Farrell
Defendant:
HL Corp (Shenzhen), HL Corp (USA), Amazon.com Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCollaum v. Texas Tech Dental et al
as 5:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Farrell Scraggs, Everette RDH and Texas Tech Dental
Plaintiff:
Max Lloyd McCollaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 7:2020cv00025
Defendant:
William Gonzalez, L Dody, R Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Johnathan Teaff, Rachell West, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz, Sr. v. Davis et al
as 9:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
Mark A Munoz, Sr. and MArk Grey Squirrel
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, L. Fatheree, Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacques v. T.D. Farrell Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13128
Plaintiff:
John Bacques
Defendant:
T.D. Farrell Construction, Inc. and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12374
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Farrell Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Lewis et al
as 9:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Mark Roberts, Billy M. Lewis, David Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Brennan Earl Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
