Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Flores v. AT&T Corp.
as 3:2017cv00318
Defendant:
AT&T Corp.
Plaintiff:
Efraim Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Rakuten Commerce, LLC d/b/a Rakuten.com
as 2:2015cv01730
Consolidated Defendant:
AT&T Corp., Office Depot, Inc., Evite, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Buy.com Inc. d/b/a Rakuten.com, Tumblr, Inc. and Rakuten Commerce, LLC d/b/a Rakuten.com
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Plaintiff:
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plectrum LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plectrum LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Corp. , AT&T Mobility, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sycamore IP Holdings LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00588
Plaintiff:
Sycamore IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Corp , AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AT&T Corp v. Level 3 Communications LLC
as 3:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. AT&T CORP
as 4:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cook , John William Cook , James Hanna and others
Defendant:
AT&T CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. AT&T CORP.
as 4:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Martha Cook
Defendant:
AT&T CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
