Cases 61 - 70 of 1,078
Keaton v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv02052
Plaintiff:
Brad Keaton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Powell et al
as 4:2022cv01767
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Jackson
Defendant:
Thomas Powell, Hiromichi Kobayashi, Michael Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haapaniemi v. Warden Hijar et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi
Defendant:
Warden Hijar and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maysonet-Galarza v. Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 5:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Maysonet-Galarza
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons and Warden S. Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Peguero v. Warden Cole et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Natanael Peguero
Defendant:
Warden Cole, GEO Group Inc., Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Bureau Of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Cory Jacobs
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kasali v. Kobayashi et al
as 4:2022cv01078
Petitioner:
Lola Shalewa Barbara Kasali
Respondent:
Hiromichi Kobayashi, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Forbes v. Zook et al
as 3:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Forbes
Defendant:
R Zook, FCI Seagoville, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
