Cases 61 - 70 of 224
Dove v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dove
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts, Sr. et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13657
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Roberts, Sr. and Natasha Roberts
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
Andrew Parker and Kim Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. , C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson Enterprises Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medical Components, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 6:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
Medical Components, Inc.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. , Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Banks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Theda Banks
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarado v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Katrina Alvarado
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv00696
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and Rafael Quinones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McPeak v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01561
Plaintiff:
Kathleen McPeak
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00685
Plaintiff:
Joyce Teague
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lauhoff v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Randall A. Lauhoff
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
