Cases 61 - 70 of 157
Travis Arnold v. Huddleston, et al
as 15-30957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER HUDDLESTON, KEVIN JOYCE, MR. WASHINGTON and others
Travis Arnold v. Kevin Joyce, et al
as 15-30945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN JOYCE, M. D. CARVAJAL, D. HUDDLESTON and others
Travis Arnold v. Russell Eliason, et al
as 15-30943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Travis Arnold v. Combs, et al
as 15-30942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Adams et al v. DZ Industries, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00779
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Nick DeBravo and William Hewitt
Defendant:
DZ Industries, Inc., Roman Pena, Donald L. Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Arnold v. Huddleston et al
as 1:2015cv01736
Plaintiff:
Travis Denorris Arnold
Defendant:
Huddleston, Kevin Joyce, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Combs et al
as 1:2015cv01726
Plaintiff:
Travis Denorris Arnold
Defendant:
Combs, Thomas D Schroeder, Russell A Eliason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Joyce et al
as 1:2015cv01734
Plaintiff:
Travis Denorris Arnold
Defendant:
Kevin Joyce, M D Carvajal, D Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Eliason et al
as 1:2015cv01725
Plaintiff:
Travis Denorris Arnold
Defendant:
Russell A Eliason, Thomas D Schroeder, Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewitt et al v. Noble Drilling US, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01197
Plaintiff:
Walter Hewitt and Patricia Hewitt
Defendant:
Noble Drilling U.S. LLC, Shell Oil Company and Franks International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
